Timothy D. Asley / AP
Chief law enforcement officers in Kentucky, Tennessee and Ohio Are challenging The Biden administration’s mandate requires federal contractors to obtain the COVID-19 vaccine.
Republican Attorney General in these three states Said He filed his lawsuit against the federal government on Thursday – just hours after the White House enacted new laws covering more than 100 million workers in the United States.
The case asks a judge to stay the execution of the mandate. Which pays some contractors until January 4. Vaccinate completely against code-19. If those workers choose not to be vaccinated, they should be tested negative for COVID-19 at least once a week. The lawsuit claims that the mandate is an example of both transgression and “illegal and unconstitutional.”
The lawsuit is part of a larger legacy of legal challenges to the vaccine mandate. ISeptember, when the White House first announced. His plan, critics – mostly Republicans – promised to sue.
And they stand by their word. Late Thursday, officials in dozens of states announced plans to file major lawsuits by Friday, when the administration’s rule will be officially published in the Federal Register.
Many Republican-led states are working together on these legal challenges. Kentucky Governor Andy Bashir is a Democrat, but the lawsuit the state is pursuing is led by Attorney General Daniel Cameron, a Republican.
A case Georgian officials say They plan to file, including in South Carolina, West Virginia, Utah, Idaho, Alabama and Kansas. Another lawsuit that Missouri officials plan to file Friday. Allegedly Alaska, Arkansas, Iowa, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wyoming.
According to, Indiana will challenge the rules in three separate cases next week. Attorney General of the State.
Texas also sued. Individually last Friday. Attorney General Paxton said: “The Biden administration has repeatedly expressed its hatred of Americans who choose not to be vaccinated, and it has repeatedly and abusively abused Americans to force them to do so. That’s what they don’t want. “
States say the mandate could mean a huge revenue loss.
Labor Secretary Marty Walsh said Consider everything On Thursday, the administration is fully prepared for the trial.
J. David Aki / AP
“We are convinced that the rule has been put together, and I think it is unfortunate that the rule has been in place for about eight hours and people are already suing it,” he said. “It’s about protecting workers in the workplace. It’s about protecting Americans. It’s about increasing the number of our people in this country who have been vaccinated.”
Like many states, Kentucky, Tennessee and Ohio each have agreements in different capacities with the federal government. Kentucky’s local prisons, for example, have agreements with the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Martial Service to detain and transfer detainees for federal crimes.
In Ohio, state universities have agreements with several federal agencies, including the Food and Drug Administration and the National Institutes of Health, according to the lawsuit.
By requiring employees to be vaccinated against COVID-19, the federal government is threatening the potential loss of millions of dollars to their lucrative federal contracts, the lawsuit claims.
Ohio Attorney General Dave Just said One of the top concerns is the potential harm to workers who drop out instead of being vaccinated.
“… A natural and expected consequence of the mandate is that employers who are important to the supply chain, and are also federal contractors, will potentially lose a significant number of employees,” the lawsuit claims. “This is entirely conceivable, therefore, the mandate will exacerbate existing supply chain problems.”
State leaders said that with more than 100 workers, private employees, who are covered by one of the new federal laws, would also suffer financially.
“I’m talking to businesses in Missouri who say this vaccine mandate will crush their business,” Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmidt said Thursday.
Litigation claims also exceed the federal threshold.
Julie Carr Smith / AP
Also at the heart of these legal challenges is the argument that the federal government is eroding its authority over the rights of states. In the Kentucky, Tennessee and Ohio cases, the argument is that Congress did not authorize the president to issue such a broad mandate.
Labor Secretary Walsh said the rule violates state and local laws that restrict or limit employers’ ability to make vaccines or testing mandatory. He told Consider everything In part, “it’s no different from Texas law that would replace a local law.”
State officials such as Ohio’s East Said on Thursday Laws violate the constitution.
“I’ve said it many times: the Biden administration doesn’t do what it wants, but it wants to,” Yust said Said. “The constitution sets out the important rules by which the executive branch must operate. Congress and the states have their own powers, which the administration cannot take only because it wants to.”